From signs of an attackto an account you can stand behind.

Illustrative incident

The alert is only the beginning.

An attacker uses a stolen employee account to enter a workstation, reach a file server and open sensitive files. An unusual connection to an external address raises another question: did information leave the organization?

Your team disables the account and isolates the workstation. Leadership still needs to know how far the incident reached and what it means.

Built into your stack, not beside it.

Identity logs record the account's use. Endpoint evidence captures activity on the workstation. File access records and network evidence help establish what happened next.

ProtecTRON integrates with the tools you already run. It investigates across their evidence, connecting findings to the records behind them and piecing together what happened.

It tests whether the evidence holds up, checks conclusions that need more support and identifies what is still missing from the investigation.

As findings are uncovered, ProtecTRON sends them back into your stack: YARA rules to scan other endpoints, new detections for your SIEM, and containment suggestions for your team.

Your tools keep detecting and containing, using findings from the investigation to look for related activity. Your analysts decide what gets deployed.

Walk into the next conversation with more than an alert.

ProtecTRON draws reporting from the investigation, so the level of detail can change without losing the evidence behind the account.

If someone asks how you reached a finding, you can follow it back to the source records.

With the board

You can explain how the compromised account was used, which systems and files the investigation has linked to it, and where the scope is still being established.

Sensitive files were opened. You still don't know whether they left the organization. The board needs to understand that uncertainty as it considers the possible consequences for the business.

With counsel and regulators

Counsel and regulators need to follow how you reached those conclusions: the sequence of events, the evidence supporting each finding, and the limits of what that evidence establishes.

If asked why the report identifies those files as accessed, your team can trace that conclusion to its supporting records. If asked whether information was taken, the account makes clear what is known and what further evidence is needed.

That gives counsel a factual basis for assessing notification and disclosure obligations, and your organization a record to support its response to regulatory questions.

Keep people informed as the picture changes.

The investigation does not have to be finished before you brief the people who depend on it.

As new evidence comes in, ProtecTRON helps you bring the next briefing up to date. You can explain what has become clearer, what is still unresolved and what that means for the decisions ahead.

In this example, you still cannot say whether data was taken. That question stays in the briefing until there is enough evidence to answer it.

Your analysts continue to direct the investigation while you keep stakeholders informed. When someone questions a finding, your team can show the evidence behind it.